Skip to content
Carlson Caspers IP Litigation & Counseling
The Go-To Firm for Patent Savvy Companies
Carlson Caspers IP Litigation & CounselingCarlson Caspers IP Litigation & Counseling
  • Home
  • About
    • About the Firm
    • Accolades
    • Firm News
    • Careers
  • Experience
    • Practice Areas
    • Industries We Serve
    • Case Studies
  • Professionals
  • Diversity
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Communities
    • Inventor Spotlight
Contact Us
  • Home
  • About
    • About the Firm
    • Accolades
    • Firm News
    • Careers
  • Experience
    • Practice Areas
    • Industries We Serve
    • Case Studies
  • Professionals
  • Diversity
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Communities
    • Inventor Spotlight
Contact Us

Daily Archives: June 27, 2016

You are here:
  1. Home
  2. 2016
  3. June
  4. 27

Submission of New Evidence After Institution of an IPR is “Perfectly Permissible”

ANDA Litigation, Appeal, IPR, PTABBy Carlson CaspersJune 27, 2016

Last week, in Genzyme v. Biomarin, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held petitioners may introduce new evidence after an institution decision in IPR proceedings as long as the opposing party received notice of the new evidence and an opportunity to respond. In its final written decision, the PTAB relied on references beyond…

Copyright 2026 Carlson, Caspers, Vandenburgh & Lindquist, P.A. | All Rights Reserved

Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions

Go to Top